I've read a friend from high school's blog today, relating to the worth of university degrees. I started a humongous reply, which after thirty minutes typing I decided the better thing to do, lest I lose it all in an unwanted computer crash, was to just post a response here. I miss the old Warwick 'block quote' function.
So Matt:
I'll start with the points on which I can see where you're coming from. On the perceived laziness of students, speaking as someone who has worked in various universities for near enough 10 years now (I consider my time, though paying no tax, as a PhD student as 'working'), there is, to some degree (pun unintended), a sense of entitlement amongst students now. I think this was fostered by the introduction of tuition fees and turned students into, for want of a better word, 'consumers'. This is probably different from the time we were both at university, given we were both in the last year group of people that received LEA grants, rather than having to pay. This has made some students complacent in their general attitude of "come on then, I've paid my money, get me a first class degree for the minimum amount of my own personal effort". It's not that simple to get a good university degree, and needs much more effort to work around read around to understand their respective subject.
The granting of many former polytechnics university status has resulted in so many more people on the job market having university degrees than would have had in the past, directly at the expense of the vocational training you're advocating. Blame the government for this imbalance, not people with degrees; they're only bettering themselves by utilising the courses available to them. More universities results in more people being degree qualified than otherwise would be. Someone without a degree is only going to struggle to get themselves seen above graduates when there are 50+ CVs to go through. A university degree is one demonstration of that person living up to his/her potential in school; it ranks them in the top x% of the population. Someone without one is unquantified; an employer isn't likely to hire someone who is an unknown quantity.
True, many people don't use the subject they learnt in their everyday jobs. They should hopefully, having been to university, be able to use the transferrable skills developed: time management, forward planning, data collation/manipulation/analysis, critical thinking, presentational skills and so on. My brother is an example of this and has steadily worked his way up the ranks at YBS. Was his degree a waste of time? Did the people I worked with in various labs in Leeds, London, Warwick and Calgary but who no longer work directly in the chemical industry waste their time? I don't know the ins and outs of your daily duties, but could someone without a degree really do them all? Certainly not mine. Nor could they be a doctor, lawyer, vet, or many many other occupations. There are so many jobs that require such extreme composure under pressure that someone who 'learns on the job' is not an option. Someone who has been through the strict regimentation some subjects offer has much better demonstrated aptitude for such tasks in the eyes of a future employer.
Onto the first thing that really annoyed me when I read your post; the singling out of biology. Biology is a fundamental, core science. There are so, so many more subjects out there worthy of your ire it's like shooting fish in a barrel when naming them; the ubiquitous Media Studies, and ephemeral 'ologies' to name two straight off the top of my head. A degree in biology or chemistry (I think) is a prerequisite of medical school here in Canada, and the States too. Replace 'biology' with 'chemistry' in that sentence and perhaps you can see why this bit jars so much with me personally.
When my PhD supervisor develops a new anti-cancer drugs, he hands them over to chemical biologists to assess their success or failure against various cancer cell lines. When a promising candidate drug is identified by pharmaceutical companies it's handed over to biologists to assess toxicity or other harmful effects. Nobody wants another thalidomide episode. Biologists study myriad animal behaviours in the hope they can isolate genes similar to those found in humans, such that they can possibly treat presently incurable human conditions such as Alzheimers, Motor Neurone Disease and Multiple Sclerosis. Is that a subject without 'real world application'? It's a sad fact that universities are closing science departments in favour of 'softer' subjects which have no need of teaching/ research laboratories and large capital expenditure on equipment. Such subjects should be encouraged.
And just what is an 'academic bum'? Given I have career aspirations in that particular direction I'd hope thats not what you'd think of me. If I ever get that far (some days it seems as far away as ever), I would hope I taught the subject well, inspire others to take the same direction and study into graduate school like I did, and to conduct research into the pressing problems of the age. I would hope PhD students from my group are trained the very best they can be and go onto productive careers in the chemical industry or academic research. In so doing, I am contributing to the technological and economic well being of the country. Is that not a good thing, or a worthy career goal?
But the thing that really raised the hackles I'm going to quote verbatim.
"The truth is that university education for most is a sham. A chance to waste three years drinking, partying and doing as little amount of work as possible."
That's so........flat out wrong. Yes, people let their hair down on a Friday/Saturday, but this is hardly a phenomenon limited to student unions up and down the land. I'm no different in the regard of unwinding with a pint or two. Since 1996 I've not been anywhere that comes even vaguely under such a description. I'd like to know what qualifies as 'most'? 75% ? 90%. I have worked and studied alongside some remarkable, diligent hard-working people. Yes, there is a small proportion of people killing time because they don't know what to do and have no career direction, but universities are full of talented people waiting to be set on their way to great things.
That took so long to write, edit and type, it's bedtime now :-)